Five to ten days of synthetic buyer research for pre-PMF founders. Your hypotheses taken to a full buying committee, and the positioning — or the complete go-to-market motion — that comes out of it.
Most research advice assumes you have customers. Before product–market fit you don't — or you have four, and they're friends. The honest options are to wait, to guess, or to build the argument now and test it against real buyers the moment you have some.
A Sprint is the third option. We take your hypotheses to synthetic buyers modeled on your buying committee, find where demand probably lives and what language it uses, and hand you positioning you can run founder-led — plus the instrument to validate it later.
What you're buying is a defensible point of view about who buys and why, built in a week instead of a quarter.
Every finding in a Sprint is inferred, and labeled that way on every page of the deliverable. Synthetic research produces population-level signal from behavioral archetypes — it does not produce evidence about your specific customers. It is the right instrument for directional decisions and the wrong one for final validation or compliance-sensitive sign-off. We say so in the report.
Synthetic user research doesn't replace the search for product–market fit — it jumpstarts it. For Narrio's founders, one ten-day Sprint moved two tracks at once: customer discovery — who the buyer really is and the language they use — and product discovery — what to build first, and what to leave for later.
The line between the paid tiers is go-to-market. Both produce a point of view you can sell with; only one builds the outbound and inbound to run it.
Price moves with archetype count, industries, geographies, and motion scope. A US and a DACH buyer are two research problems, not one persona in two languages — added geographies price as a multiplier.
A compliance platform serving several industries had no way to choose between them. The Sprint took six founder hypotheses to a four-role buying committee and came back with the category to lead with, the roles that actually champion the product — not just the COO they'd been targeting, but the security and data-protection leaders who feel the pain daily — and calibrated Asks for each.
A stalled-deal push in the research becomes that persona's pain hook, becomes the email subject line, becomes the proof block on the landing page. You can follow the chain backward from any sentence to the evidence underneath it.
Founder-led means founder-led. No rep enablement, no sequence tooling, no handoff plan. At seed a DM from a founder outperforms a salesperson two to three times over, and the motion is built around that.
Your hypotheses, your buying committee, and the decision the research has to serve. We scope to one decision, not to a topic.
Four to eight behavioral archetypes built on your ICP, each carrying its own personality profile — so objections and priorities differ by role the way they do on a real committee.
Hypotheses taken to each archetype independently. Full transcripts, not summaries — you see the reasoning, including where archetypes contradict each other.
Patterns across archetypes, the positioning that follows, and — on the $7,500 tier — the outbound and inbound built from it. Plus an explicit list of what the Sprint could not answer and what method would.
Both clients agreed to publish the complete report — method, archetypes, verbatims, and findings. Read them and see exactly what the difference between the tiers looks like.
A pre-PMF compliance platform serving multiple industries, with no way to choose between them. Six founder hypotheses taken to a four-role buying committee, producing a category frame, buyer-confirmed POVs, and calibrated Asks.
$7,500 scope · NarrioFour leadership archetypes in mid-market B2B SaaS, with frontline sales voices run in parallel — then a complete founder-led motion: per-persona positioning, outbound DMs and emails, comment hooks, inbound themes, and landing page copy.
You could generate something that looks like this in an afternoon. The generation was never the hard part.
The hard part is the question set. Most founder-run discovery asks what people want and what they'd pay — both of which produce polite, useless answers. A Sprint runs on the six forces that actually move a buyer: pushes, pulls, desires, avoidances, habits, and anxieties. Three promote change and three resist it, and the resisting three are where the answer usually is.
Nobody prompts for the barrier side, because it's counterintuitive to ask why someone wouldn't buy the thing you're building. That's the half of the model that explains why a market with an obvious problem still won't move.
This objection gets stronger every quarter as models improve. We think that's fine — a Sprint is an entry point that leads somewhere, not a moat.
Pre-funding only. If you've raised a Series A, you have the budget — this isn't for you, and the application will say so.
A Founder Sprint is free in exchange for three things. A professionally produced video testimonial within 30 days, yours to use anywhere. Publication of the complete findings report — your company name, your name and title, and the research itself. And a brief 90-day follow-up on what you ran and what happened. You get seven days to flag anything commercially sensitive before we publish.
Not selected? Most applicants aren't — slots are limited each quarter. The $3,500 Sprint covers the same ground with more depth and no waiting.
A Sprint tells you where demand probably is. It cannot tell you that it's there — only real buyers can do that.
That's why the screener and guide are part of the deliverable. When you have customers, churned accounts, or lost deals worth interviewing, the instrument is already built and already sharpened against every archetype on your committee. Most teams run a Sprint at seed and a Customer Intelligence Study at Series A — same question, same guide, real buyers, and a motion you can defend in a board meeting rather than one you're still testing.